Independents may bridge partisan divisions, say experts at ASU event
Morrison Institute conference addresses how voters are turning away from 2 main parties
Independent voters, who resist being identified with either of the main political parties, could be a way for a deeply divided electorate to move forward, according to several experts at the annual “State Of Our State” conference on Wednesday in Phoenix.
“Independent voters can provide a bridge to close the partisan gap,” said Thom Reilly, director of the Morrison Institute for Public Policy at Arizona State University, which sponsored the conference.
Reilly said the institute has new research, not yet complete, showing that Republican respondents were more likely to discuss politics with friends who were independents than with Democrats. Independents make up about a third of registered voters in Arizona and were the largest single bloc of voters until registered Republicans recently overtook them.
“But for years independent voters have been ‘the other’ and treated as invisible by think tanks and in studies and polls,” Reilly said.
The conference featured a panel discussion that addressed the importance of voters who are not aligned with either major political party.
Independents were the deciding factor in electing Republican Donald Trump on Nov. 8, just as they were the deciding factor in electing President Barack Obama in 2008, according to Jackie Salit, president of the Committee for a Unified Independent Party and its online affiliate, IndependentVoting.org.
“It’s important to understand that independents, now 43 percent of the national electorate, represent a force of motion that is crying out for a new kind politics in this country,” said Salit.
Some panelists said that the two-party system disenfranchises people who don’t want to choose either Democrat or Republican.
Chuck Couglin, president of AZ High Ground campaign-consulting firm based in Phoenix, said that partisan primaries are a Soviet-style system.
“Why can’t I have a ballot with everyone on it? Let me as a candidate access that ballot. It’s disenfranchising for any independent to run,” he said, criticizing the fact that taxpayers pay for elections, which support the entrenched two-party system.
Daniel Ortega, a civil rights leader and attorney, said that Latino voters are especially left out.
“More than 60 percent of Latino millennials are independent, and 43 percent of Latinos in this state are independent. The party structure does not work for the Latino community,” said Ortega.
“Per capita, our voting percentage is down even though we have more registered voters because they can’t vote in the primary.”
And the two-party primary system has led to deep ideological divisions that hinder collaboration according to Paul Johnson, former mayor of Phoenix and an activist for non-partisan elections.
“In this election, many Americans felt like they were choosing between the lesser of two evils and they weren’t voting for someone but against someone and that’s part of the partisan primary voting system,” he said.
“You’re talking about 5 or 6 percent of people who are making the decisions in the primary and they are demanding candidates be ideologically pure. So the candidates are divisive and split the country up.
“So it’s going to be more difficult for elected people to cross the aisle and work with both sides. It will be a winner-take-all system.”
Not everyone believes that independent voters are left out. Robert Graham, chairman of the Arizona Republican Party, said that engaged independents should be able to find out how to get information and cast ballots. “It shouldn’t be handed to them.”
Doug Chapin, director of the University of Minnesota’s Program for Excellence in Election Administration, said that the population changes affiliations back and forth over time.
“But there is a strengthening number of committed independents who really do follow politics, do have a worldview and the one thing they agree on is that they’re not Democrats and they’re not Republican.”
Two longtime politicians from Arizona said they see little chance of bipartisan collaboration immediately ahead after the brutal election.
Former Sen. Jon Kyl, a Republican who served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1987 to 1995 and then the Senate until 2013, said that pressure from the highly fractured parties will make compromise difficult.
“We’ve allowed politicians to get to the point where a candidate can take the populist, demagogue position to get elected and then they find themselves in a governing situation that’s very difficult,” Kyl said.
Former U.S. Rep. Ed Pastor, a Democrat, said that politicians must develop personal relationships with each other. Pastor was elected to Congress in 1991 and served as the first Mexican-American congressman to represent Arizona, retiring in 2015.
“In 1994, when the Republicans won, I wondered what would happen, but I had developed relationships and we were able to bridge some of the problems,” he said.
Grady Gammage Jr., a senior research fellow in the Morrison Institute, moderated the discussion between Kyl and Pastor and said that talking with people from the other political side is what will preserve democracy.
“I have felt for months that it was incredibly difficult to talk to people about politics, and for me that was incredibly painful,” said Gammage Jr.
“I think society is advanced through intelligent argument.”
Jonathan Koppell, dean of ASU Public Service and Community Solutions, praised the Morrison Institute’s mission of providing a space for conversations from differing points of view.
“There have been times that people have said that politics doesn’t matter and that it’s entertainment,” he said.
“It’s our job to underscore how much it does matter.”
Originally published at asunow.asu.edu on November 16, 2016.